Comedy has a liberal bias

Via.

Alison Dagnes has researched political comedy in the U.S., and was interviewed by the Smithsonian about it. Here's a couple of her takes:

You say that there are very understandable reasons that the majority of satirists are liberal. What are these reasons? 

Satire is an anti-establishmentarian art form. It is an outsider art. If you mock people who aren’t in power, it isn’t very funny. Satire really is the weapon of the underdog. It is the weapon of the person out of power against the forces in power. It is supposed to take down the sacred cows of politics and differentiate between what is and what should be…. 

Time magazine conducted a poll asking its readers to identify the most trusted newsperson in America. The winner was Jon Stewart. How do you feel about this? 

… Jon Stewart and his writing staff at The Daily Show do a tremendous job of exposing hypocrisy. They do exactly what satirists are supposed to do. They differentiate between what is and what should be, and that is invaluable. 

[But] you cannot go to Jon Stewart or Stephen Colbert and understand something that is going on that is multifaceted and complicated…. I like to give an analogy. I know practically nothing about sports. So, when my husband turns on ESPN, I don’t understand sports better, because they are doing commentary on something that I don’t understand. The same thing goes for any of the satire programs. They are doing comedy on something, and you better have a preexisting understanding of it or else you are not going to get the joke.