Showing posts with label Mitch McConnell. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mitch McConnell. Show all posts

Friday, November 22, 2013

Hypocrisy, thy name is Mitch McConnell

As you know, the Democrats voted to change the Senate procedure to “majority rule” for executive branch and judicial nominees. Why’d they do this? Because of Senator Mitch McConnell (Republican, Kentucky) and his G.O.P. colleagues, who routinely reject any Obama nominee because, well, they are Obama nominees.

And now that the Senate rules have changed, McConnell is spitting mad! Which is kind of odd, given that he said this back in 2005.
“I think the president is entitled to an up-or-down--that is simple majority--vote on nominations, both to his Cabinet and to the executive branch and also to the judiciary. The filibuster was not used for 200 years. The country did just fine. Sometimes the court would jag off to the left, and sometimes it would slide over to the right. Presidents trying to mold the Supreme Court is nothing new. It's not inappropriate. And we need to get back to tradition, and the tradition is a majority is enough to confirm a judge.”
But once a Democrat was elected president, all bets were off! During Obama’s presidency, there’ve been 81 cloture motions – attempts at defeating a filibuster.

In just Obama’s first five years he got clotured more than all the other presidents combined since filibusters of judicial and executive branch nominees began in 1968. Prior to Obama, cloture was invoked 68 times total. Obama? 81!

In 2005, McConnell explained why these clotures were rare:

“What typically happens is we exercise self-restraint, and we do not engage in that kind of behavior because invoking certain obstructionist tactics would upset the Senate's unwritten rules.”

Friday, October 4, 2013

So, which is it?

This isn't some damn game!
—House Speaker John Boehner 


We’re going to win this.”
—Senator Rand Paul (Republican, Kentucky), talking to Mitch McConnell on a hit mike. (Of course, we know who's losing—this eight-year-old cancer patient who can't get treatment with the FDA shutdown.)

Friday, August 9, 2013

Sunday, August 4, 2013

Mitch McConnell just got SERVED!


"Let's tell it like it is. If the doctors told Senator McConnell he had a kidney stone, he wouldn't pass it." 

Tuesday, July 2, 2013

What rhymes with "Seeking an end to McConnell's slime"?

Alison Lundergan Grimes is the Kentucky secretary of state. And she's decided to run against Sen. Mitch McConnell (Republican) for his seat this year.

I was surprised to hear McConnell respond to this challenge with atypical class
"Accepting the invitation from countless Washington liberals to become President Obama's Kentucky candidate was a courageous decision by Alison Lundergan Grimes and I look forward to a respectful exchange of ideas."
I should have known better. McConnell's campaign quickly threw up a video ad ("What rhymes with Alison Lundergan Grimes?") attacking Grimes as, among other things, "a left wing mime." Which makes no sense, because a mime is silent, but the ad features plenty of sampling (and autotuning) of Grimes' public appearances.
But already, new lyrics are being suggested. My two favorites:

What rhymes with Grimes? 

Her opponent's years behind the times.

What rhymes with Mitch? 

He Autotuned her vocal pitch.

What rhymes with Mitch?
That slimy little son of a… gun!

Friday, June 28, 2013

You know what? Fuck those guys.


From TPM:
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (Republican-Kentucky) and Minority Whip John Cornyn (Republican-Texas) sent letters warning six professional sports leagues not to provide the Obama administration any assistance in promoting Obamacare. 
The letters, dated June 27, warn the chiefs of the National Football League, Major League Baseball, National Basketball Association, National Hockey League, Professional Golf Association and NASCAR that partnering with the administration to publicize the benefits of the health care law would damage their reputations. 
The letter reads, “Given the divisiveness and persistent unpopularity of this bill, it is difficult to understand why an organization like yours would risk damaging its inclusive and apolitical brand by lending its name to its promotion.” 
Yes, this "unpopular" bill is supported by a re-elected president and the Supreme Court. *facepalm*